Fixed Effects Likelihood (FEL)#

What question does this method answer?

FEL (Fixed Effects Likelihood) addresses the question: Which specific sites in a gene show evidence of positive diversifying or purifying selection that has been consistently maintained (pervasive) across the entire evolutionary phylogeny of the analyzed sequences?

Recommended Applications

  • Pervasive Selection / Evolutionary Arms Races: Ideally suited to identify candidate sites subject to strong selective pressures across the entire phylogeny, which is common in pathogen evolution and arms-race dynamics (e.g., adaptive immune escape by viruses).
  • Small-to-Medium Datasets: FEL is the recommended method for analyzing small-to-medium size datasets (up to ~100 sequences) when one wishes only to study pervasive selection at individual sites.

Description#

The Fixed Effects Likelihood (FEL) method is used to identify individual codons that have been subject to pervasive diversifying or purifying selection. This method is suitable for small to medium-sized datasets and assumes that selection pressure at a site is constant along the entire phylogeny. FEL directly estimates nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitution rates for each site and uses a likelihood ratio test to infer selection.

Statistical Method#

FEL employs a maximum-likelihood framework to infer site-specific rates of nonsynonymous (dN or β) and synonymous (dS or α) substitutions. The method fits an MG94xREV codon model to each site in a coding sequence alignment, given a phylogenetic tree.

A key assumption of FEL is that the selective pressure for each site is constant across all branches of the phylogeny. To test for selection at a site, FEL uses a likelihood ratio test (LRT). This test compares the likelihood of a null model, where dN = dS, to an alternative model, where dN and dS are estimated independently.

If the alternative model provides a significantly better fit to the data (i.e., the LRT statistic is large and the p-value is small), then the null model of neutral evolution is rejected. - Positive (or diversifying) selection is inferred when dN > dS. - Purifying (or negative) selection is inferred when dN < dS.

Publication#

Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., and Frost, S. D. W. "Not So Different After All: A Comparison of Methods for Detecting Amino Acid Sites Under Selection." Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1208–1222 (2005).

Visualization#

The JSON output from FEL can be interactively visualized at vision.hyphy.org/FEL. You can upload the lysozyme.fel.json file to the visualizer. This will generate:

  • A plot of dN/dS ratios for each site, allowing for easy identification of sites under selection.
  • Bar plots of the estimated dN and dS rates for each site.
  • A table of the site-by-site results.

This interactive visualization is a powerful tool for exploring the results and identifying key sites of interest.

Published Applications#

The FEL method has been used in a variety of studies to detect selection in genes from different organisms. Some examples include: